Arabic original here. Part one of this article can be read here.
Towards Elaborating an Orthodox Position toward What is
Happening (II)
We are still speaking within the context of politics.
There is a distinction in the Church between the person and
his opinion and it is the starting-point for how we deal with each other. In
any situation, we are committed to the person without regard to his opinion. No
matter how perverse his opinion may be, this should not affect our commitment
to him. The correctness of his opinion, in our view, should not increase our
commitment to him, nor should the error of his position opinion the power of
this commitment. The sole commandment that we believers in Jesus Christ have
received is for us to be committed: “Love one another as I have loved you.”
This is not the love that members of a tribe have for each other. We are not a
tribe. This is our loving the entire world with the love that God has for us. The
sign that we practice it in deed and not just in word is that we, as the people
of the house of God are bound, in spirit and in truth, to the utmost limits of
the commandment of love: “Love your enemies. Bless those who curse you. Pray
for those who do you harm and persecute you.”
The difference between equating a position with the one
holding it and distinguishing the person from his opinion is great. In the
first case, we are standing before a human reaction. In the second case, we are
before a divine impulse. In the first case, we stand before a human whom we
have objectified. In the second case, we are before a being like us, who has
what we have, who was brought out of nothing into being by the all-surpassing
love of God. In the first case, we honor people because their opinions are
compatible with our own. In the second case we honor others as a way of
honoring God. In the first case, we fall in our selfishness. In the second case
we rise in our otherness. In the first case, we judge people on the basis of
our own opinion. In the second case, we respect people's right to have an
opinion that is different from our own. In the first case, we stand before our
conviction in the absoluteness of our opinion. In the second case, we are
before the relative nature of how people express their opinions in truth. In
the first case, we act, implicitly, as though we regard ourselves as infallible.
In the second case, we act implicitly as though we regard ourselves as subject
to making mistakes. In the first case, we act as though we regard ourselves as
self-sufficient. In the second case, we act as though we regard ourselves as
completed through others. In the first case, we seek our enmity to establish ourselves.
In the second case, we seek our brotherhood, to establish that God is with us
and among us. In the first case, we are prepared to go so far as to eliminate
others, in one way or another, and we think that in this way we make the truth
or offer a service to God. In the second case, we are prepared to go so far as
to sacrifice ourselves for the sake of others, realizing the truth and
imitating the Lord Jesus Christ! Finally, in the first case we stand before
self-love, while in the second case we stand before God’s love with all our
heart and soul and strength.
Relying on the distinction between a person and his opinion
and being committed to the person in any situation is something difficult, you
say? Indeed, it's humanly impossible! You say that it is theoretical? Not at
all, it is spiritual, a work of the Spirit of God! It is theoretical if one
does not know or does not follow things spiritual! You say that it is
unrealistic? Not at all, it is very realistic! The important thing is which
realism you mean. There is realism and then there is realism. There is purely
human realism. Perhaps this is what you mean. Within the framework of this
realism, what I am saying is naturally unrealistic! But there is theantrhopic
realism that responds to the reality that the Son of God entered into our life
through His incarnation! Within the framework of this new reality, what I am
saying is not only realistic, but also intuitive!
And so, distinguishing between the ruler and his regime or
between any group and the political opinions that they adopt is not only
necessitated by the nature of the new life, exemplified in the consciousness of
the believer, in the Church of Christ—it can only come out of true, authentic
love in Christ. This does not come from fabrication, play-acting, or trading in
words. It comes from exemplifying God’s love in the heart. And exemplifying God’s
love comes from keeping the commandment. At the moment when we follow the
commandment, God dwells within us and we are filled with love from His love. “If
anyone loves Me, he will keep My word; and My Father will love him, and We will
come to him and make Our home with him” (John 14:23).
Either Christ is with us and among us or we have nothing
whatsoever to bring us together and unite us. We remain divided in our hearts, opposing
each other in our intentions. Either the love of Christ or the stench of death!
There is no substitute for divine love! What people say about us is worthless.
People make judgments according to appearances. What God says has value, and God
is the God of hearts. So the choice is between our authenticity in love and going
astray, no matter how elaborate and researched our opinions may be! Then authenticity
alone will bring about inner uprightness. When we walk in uprightness we are no
longer concerned with pleasing people, but rather we are concerned with
pleasing God. We no longer love them as they want, by going along with what
they desire, but as God wants us to love them. We do not applaud their desires,
fearing them or selling out. Instead, we bear witness to divine truth in their
face, for their salvation and to the glory of God. We do not behave hypocritically,
seeking cowardly profit, whether personal or for the community, or seeking to
protect those in power. “God must be obeyed, not people.” So we obey God’s word
and bear witness to it, even if the price is the martyrdom of blood! We have no
profits and no privileges here! The people of the house of God are concerned
with the kingdom and nothing else!
However, from the love of God and from the love of God alone
within us, two things emerge, without which we have no true testimony: divine
wisdom and the courage that is from above. If it is wise for us to be silent
like the Lord Jesus before Pilate, then wisdom is what will inspire us to this.
And if it is wise for us to speak like the Apostle Paul spoke before the ruler
Faustus and the governor Felix, then we will speak the divine word of truth and
not keep silent. If it is of God’s wisdom for us to say in all courage to those
who are dealing with us what we see in them, it is not possible for us to hold
back and keep faith in God. In the fourth century, Saint Basil the Great was
not afraid of the Arian governor Modestus when he wanted to crush his
resistance. Rather he said to him frankly, “The ruler does not believe in the
true faith. You are heretics!” In 1922 when Saint Tikhon, the Russian
patriarch, was brought before a Soviet tribunal and was asked by its head, “Do
you consider the laws in force in the country to be unjust,” he did not
hesitate to reply, “Yes, I consider them unjust!”
A beautiful account of the firmness of the faithful, when
required, is found in the life of the martyr Saint Christopher, Patriarch of
Antioch (d. 967). It is said that a priest who was a physician fell into a
minor sin and the patriarch imposed a penance upon him. The priest asked one of
the Hamdanid emirs to intervene, as he was a dear physician to him. When the emir
asked the patriarch to pardon him, he replied, “It is not possible for me to do
that, my lord.” He said, “Do you not fear me? What is it that you cannot do if
I command you to do it?” He replied, “That which pertains to my religion, my
dogma, and my law, because we are in your obedience and in other matters we
cannot disobey you. But regarding that which has been set aside by religion, we
are prepared to be imprisoned and beheaded. The emir said, “In any case, let me
know what this offence is, that touches upon your religion.” The patriarch
responded, “Before this, O emir, it was a minor crime and easy to put aright.
But now it is great and impossible to pardon, since it is not permitted for a
priest to appeal to you, a Muslim who is against our belief, in a matter that
pertains to the Church and no one else.
For this reason we deal with rulers and those in whose midst
God has planted us with true, pure, unwavering love. We love them and do not
show them favor. We trust them in truth and do not endorse their passions. We
pray from the heart that the Lord God will grant them His wisdom, keep them,
and repel from them every trick of the Enemy, for their contentment, the people’s
good, and God’s glory. We encourage them in truth and do not fear them in
falsehood. We participate with them in suffering and sacrifice for the nation,
and we share in their consolation. We
weep with those who week and rejoice with those who are joyful. We do not
participate in their sins, but we participate in their suffering even if their
sins are not our sins! We feed the hungry at all times, give drink to the
thirsting, give ointment to the wounded, clothe the naked, and visit the sick.
This is not a media posture. This is the life story of the faithful. This is
not announced verbally. This is built upon upright behavior in how we deal with
those who believe in Jesus Christ and others. All are our neighbors when we
love them. Love is initiative and not reaction. Every day we untiringly build
these up with others as bridges. These are the building-blocks of our politics
at their deepest. From this well we draw our opinions in truth. Otherwise we
are hollow and have become trivial among the trivial! What value is there to be
sound in body and to be perishing in the soul? “What benefit is it for a person
if he gains the whole world but loses his soul”?! One who does not love is not
free from his whims. One who walks in passions is a slave to his passions. One
who is not free from his whims cannot help to free anyone. True freedom is
inner, existential freedom. Civil freedom is not a virtue and has no value in
itself! This is our testimony in Christ, that we strive to liberate the world
through the divine love that is active within us! Aside from this, we have no
testimony to give!
Archimandrite Touma (Bitar)
Abbot of the Monastery of St Silouan the Athonite- Douma
July 8, 2012
2 comments:
I don't really know Orthodox theology on these issues. Is martyrdom a positive obligation? Is self-defense a sin?
Regarding self-defense, it's common in Orthodox sources to read John 15:13 as sanctioning defense of family and country using force, usually contrasting it with Matthew 5:39, which is interpreted as forbidding violence in defending one's own person.
Post a Comment